Home

Silent US Bombs On Iraq

Comment by Larry Ross, July 18, 2007

The US military and civilian war makers in Washington have learned lessons from the Vietnam War - how to minimize domestic outrage and protest. One tactic is to strictly control the media and reportage of their bombing raids on civilian centres - and the casualties of innocent men, women and children in Iraq. What the US people don't know about, they can't protest or be spurred to action. The Pentagon doesn't want another Vietnam, where US barbarity was featured in the Press and TV every night. The US people could not stomach this and responded with giant demonstrations which helped stop the war. But today, the demonstrations have become much smaller mainly because the media are much more under Pentagon and Bush regime control. The worst is kept from the US people who are given a limited, fictional picture of what is being done in their name.

The following article opens up this important subject, exploring Bush's genocide from the air. The Bush regime plans to occupy Iraq in their new huge US military bases and the largest US embassy in the world for an indefinite future. That means pacifying the Iraq population at any cost - including genocide from the air. The US media co-operate with this objective by their silence about the US air bombardment of civilian areas.

However even keeping the US public in the dark about the degree of Bush's barbarism, enough of the facts trickle through. Recent polls show Bush's popularity has sunk to an all time low of 26% and a majority of the people want US troops brought home.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Silence of the Bombs

by Norman Solomon, June 12, 2007

    Three years have passed since most Americans came to the conclusion that the Iraq war was a "mistake." Reporting the results of a Gallup poll in June 2004, USA Today declared: "It is the first time since Vietnam that a majority of Americans has called a major deployment of US forces a mistake." And public opinion continued to move in an antiwar direction. But such trends easily coexist with a war effort becoming even more horrific.

    In Washington, over the past 25 years, top masters of war have preened themselves in the glow of victory after military triumphs in Grenada, Panama, the 1991 Gulf War, Yugoslavia and Afghanistan. During that time, with the exception of the current war in Iraq, the Pentagon's major aggressive ventures have been cast in a light of virtue rewarded - in sync with the implicit belief that American might makes right.

    "The problem after a war is with the victor," longtime peace activist A. J. Muste observed several decades ago. "He thinks he has just proved that war and violence pay."

    The present situation has a different twist along the same lines. The Iraq war drags on, the United States is certainly not the victor - and the US president, a fervent believer in war and violence, still has a lot to prove.

    Faith that American might makes right is apt to be especially devout among those who command the world's most powerful military - and have the option of trying to overcome wartime obstacles by unleashing even more lethal violence.

    These days, there's a lot of talk about seeking a political solution in Iraq - but the Bush administration and the military leaders who answer to the commander in chief are fundamentally engaged in a very different sort of project. Looking ahead, from the White House, the key goal is to seem to be winding down the U.S. war effort while actually reconfiguring massive violence to make it more effective.

    Two sets of figures have paramount importance in mainline US media and politics - the number of U.S. troops stationed in Iraq and the number of them dying there. Often taking cues from news media and many lawmakers on Capitol Hill, antiwar groups have tended to buy into the formula, emphasizing those numbers and denouncing them as intolerably high.

    Meanwhile, the Iraqis killed by Americans don't become much of an issue in the realms of US.

Continue.....