June 10, 2004

Letter to The Star Times, Christchurch

Sir,
George Bush's unprovoked invasion of Iraq, based on lies and faulty intelligence, including a greater illingness to use nuclear weapons, and violation of international treaties, shows that the U.S. has become more of a threat to world peace, than a few "mad mullahs and madder adherents" as claimed by Michael Laws (6/6/04). There would be reduced security, not increased security as he claims, if New Zealand amends its nuclear free legislation to allow U.S. nuclear warships to visit our ports. Being defended by the U.S. could be the kiss of death for NZ.

In various accident situations, nuclear warships can be far more dangerous than conventional ships. There is added risk in a war where they could become targets in our ports, or potential targets for terrorists anytime. If NZ supports U.S. wars, like Iraq, the risk is increased. In a war or international crisis, the U.S. may rearm warships with nuclear weapons. Even if our government was informed at the time, they would probably turn a blind eye to potential nuclear weapons, like the Danes, particularly if they were supporting the U.S. in the war. We don't need a free trade deal with the U.S. It could be of limited value and contain hazards.Trade with the U.S. has consistently gone up since our nuclear ban in 1984. We are "very,very, close friends" according to Colin Powell, and cooperate in many ways. NZ's nuclear free courage and independance is admired internationally. It boosts our reputation, trade and tourism.

It's best to keep our nuclear free laws unchanged.

Larry Ross, Secretary,
NZ Nuclear-Free Peacemaking