New Nuclear Arms Race

New Nuclear Arms Race

Comment by Larry Ross, December 26, 2006

This is very valuable paper because it shows how influential people and countries are using the terrorist threat to advance their ambitions to make nuclear weapons.

Also, it gives an insight into the origins of American neoconservatism and its American author Leo Strauss, whose mentor was Carl Schmitt, an infamous Nazi law professor under Hitler. Leo Strauss teachings reflected those of his Nazi mentor, and his US students are now highly placed and very influential in formulating American policies under President Bush.

The neocons are behind the new US policies of allowing a US President to wage pre-emptive nuclear war against a non-nuclear enemy who may, or may not, have committed an aggressive act, or terrorist attack, on the US.

However if a US Administration believes that a country, or its agents, might commit such an act against the US , they may wage a pre-emptive nuclear war against it, or against a country harbouring its agents or terrorists, who might make such an attack.

In other words the decision to launch a sudden pre-emptive nuclear war may be based on suspicion alone. Given the Bush neocons policy of "doctoring" "altering" "cherry picking" or simply "ignoring" or overruling intelligence that does not support their planned war policies, this gives the Bush regime a 'carte blanche' to make war on who they please, when they please, and invent suitable reasons, as they did with their completely deceitful Iraq war invasion and occupation. The other new neocon US nuclear policy is that the US may now introduce nuclear weapons use into a conventional weapons war. That is, they can escalate from conventional weapons use to nuclear weapons use at the discretion of Field Commanders advice. For good measure their papers have specified up to nine nuclear and non-countries, including China and Russia that could be targets for American nuclear warfare.

These new policies have naturally alerted and disturbed other countries, who are reconsidering their own nuclear weapons policy like Germany below.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Germany debating nuclear weapons

by Francis Boyle, January 28, 2006

Remember the Nazis had their law professors too. Carl Schmitt was the most notorious Nazi Law Professor. He was mentor to and sponsor for Leo Strauss, who founded the Neo-Conservative Movement in the United States. These Neo-Cons are Neo-Nazis. We have many of these Neo-Con Neo-Nazi Law Professors in the United States, almost all of them affiliated with the right-wing, racist, bigoted, reactionary, sexist, warmongering and totalitarian Federalist Society. Scholz should join the Federalist Society.
He would fit right in.

Francis A. Boyle, Professor of Law

Scholz is not only former German Defense Minister but also a professor of law!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Germany Should Consider Nuclear Arms, Ex-Official Says

January 26, 2006

http://www.nti.org/d_newswire/issues/2006_1_26.html#0BD4BF5C

A former top German official said yesterday that his country should consider building a nuclear arsenal in response to the threat of nuclear terrorism, Deutsche Presse-Agentur reported today.

"We need a serious discussion over how we can react to a nuclear threat by a terrorist state in an appropriate manner - and in extreme cases with our own nuclear weapons," said former Defense Minister Rupert Scholz.

A member of Chancellor Angela Merkel's Christian Democratic Union party, Scholz said Berlin should first seek binding guarantees from NATO that the alliance would protect Germany in the event of a nuclear threat (Deutsche Presse-Agentur/MonstersandCritics.com, Jan. 26).

Home Disclaimer/Fair Use