Analysis of Bush Dictatorship Comment by Larry Ross, July 18, 2007
The following analysis from the Radical Left could have from Conservative or Radical Right sources as well. It is really a matter of objectively considering the facts, cutting through the double think, propaganda and party loyalties to make an honest analysis - and perhaps face some very unpleasant facts and suspicions. Some of the best analysts are from the right of the political spectrum - people like John Paul Roberts and Morgan Reynolds. I really respect and feature their work although I would be labelled as from the left of the political spectrum. In fact I'm neither right nor left and reject this kind of 'don't think' labelling. The labels 'right and left' when applied to people or political thoughts often inhibits a rational consideration of the issue at hand. The tendency is to generate an immediate bias and then dismiss the issue without consideration. Another example is if someone says or writes: - that's a 'conspiracy theory' or he's a 'conspiracy theorist' or, 'conspiracy nut'. Again, the purpose is to demean and belittle the person and the theory or argument, so that it is not examined with rationality. Often that is enough for a person to simply delete the item and not examine it. But if examined at all, it will be with a pre-programmed bias, with a person ready to react as programmed. During the cold war, it used to be that anything labelled as "communist" or "communist propaganda" or "left leaning" was enough to discourage rational consideration. We were told what to think, what to accept and what to reject by the would-be policemen of our thinking and what we were allowed to consider. The situation is the same today, because people are still 'sheeple'. They have not learned. They go with the authorities of the day. Sheeple believe the most outrageous lies and happily reject huge bodies of evidence that show what they wish to believe, is nothing but a lie. They can be terribly smug and righteous about upholding a big lie, and trashing any contrary theory no matter how well documented. They are the same kind of people who used to burn witches at the stake for their supposed wicked deviations from the 'truths' given to them by the high priests of the time. Bush's neocons are the high priests of today - inventing realities to justify their policies. Confounding though it may be, the 'Sheeple' will condemn Bush and his mind-shaping team, but nevertheless they believe the new lies Bush and his neocons spew forth and they are suspicions of any theory that questions these lies. There are millions of sheeple and they are described very well in George Orwell's book "1984". This introduction is necessary to try and eliminate any irrational, programmed bias, and allow your mind to objectively consider the issue and the following argument from the Radical Left. However, after it is an argument from the right by Prof. Morgan Reynolds, a high appointee of the first Bush Administration.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
General George Bush: America's Presidential-Military Dictator by Jo Swift, July 16, 2007
|