Home

Shyster Lawyer Fronts for Bush Domestic and Imperial Adventures

Comment by Larry Ross, November 25, 2004

The record of Albert Gonzales, the new US Attorney General, indicates he will help smooth the way for Bush to continue and extend his illegal war agenda. The UN Charter, International law, the Nuremberg Conventions, the American Constitution, and prohibitions on the use of torture, are now extensively violated in the Afghanistan and Iraq wars with the approval of Albert Gonzales. While displaying a phoney patriotic fervour, religious piety, and ersatz morality, Bush is likely to proceed with his crusade of slaughter and conquest under the guise of "introducing freedom and democracy" in the Middle East. With the Gonzales appointment, Bush has taken a big step toward remaking America in his own image.

In Iraq it's very much like how the Spanish Inquisition introduced Christianity to those they decided were unbelievers. They were tortured to force confessions, then burned alive in order to save their souls. Like Iraqis, bombed to death and maiming, in order to see the benefits and freedoms of American Democracy.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

Why The USA Must Reject Bush's Evil "Marquis de Sade" Nominee For Attorney General: Alberto Gonzales Wrote
"Torture Memo" That Laid Groundwork For Abu Ghraib

by Evan Augustine Peterson III, J.D.,  November 22, 2004

 

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root."
-Henry David Thoreau, Walden (1854)


There was a bipartisan consensus on last Sunday's televised political talk-shows that the US Senate will confirm, with relative ease, Mr. Bush's appointment of Alberto R. Gonzales as the next Attorney General ("AG").  However, if our Senators retain any respect for universal human rights and the rule of constitutional and international law, they will vigorously oppose Mr. Gonzales' appointment as our new AG. [1] [2]  Furthermore, it's imperative that our Senators, both left and right, defeat this unwise appointment for the following five reasons. 


1. Mr. Gonzales Knew, Or Should Have Known, That He Was Dispensing Disastrously False Legal Advice. While functioning as Mr. Bush's White House Counsel, Mr. Gonzales wrote his infamous "torture memo" in August of 2002, entitled "Standards Of conduct For Interrogations Under 18 U.S.C. 2340-2340A."  In that legally-meritless 50-page opinion, Mr. Gonzales: (A) falsely argued that the US government's interrogators would be legally justified in torturing -- even unto death -- war prisoners who were captured in the USA's so-called "war on terror"; and (B) falsely advised President Bush that his subfunction as commander-in-chief somehow magically empowered him with the authority to (i) override the US Constitution and the federal War Crimes Act, (ii) ignore the Geneva Conventions and the United Nations Convention On Torture, (iii) flout international human-rights law, and (iv) therefore authorize those acts of torture.  "Taking his cue from the Nazis' 'führer principle,' Gonzales posits that Bush, by virtue of his 'commander-in-chief authority,' can authorize torture.  But American law doesn't include any such concept." [3]


2. Mr. Gonzales Has Been Egregiously Complicit In War Crimes. The entire world knows that Mr. Gonzales' 2002 legal memorandum paved the way for the perpetration of heinous war crimes, like the illegal torture of war prisoners inside the US military prisons in Guantanamo Bay, Afghanistan, and Iraq.  Even worse, the Pentagon now admits that there have been 127 recent homicides of war prisoners, of whom at least 40 were tortured to death. [4]  And according to the highly-respected International Committee of the Red Cross, almost all of the Iraqi prisoners who managed to survive their torture inside Abu Ghraib prison were released because they proved to be innocent civilian noncombatants. [5]  Hence, it's certainly possible that Mr. Gonzales could be indicted for his complicity in war crimes under Nüremberg Principle VII, among others. [6] [7]


3. Mr. Gonzales Has An Ominous History Of Unethical Practice. Americans should consider themselves to have been doubly forewarned by Mr. Gonzales' record as both a lawyer and a jurist in Texas.  Before he became Mr. Bush's White House Counsel, Mr. Gonzales: (A) represented CEO Ken Lay's fraudulent-predator corporation, Enron; and (B) then earned a reputation from the bench for unsound legal rulings which contravened the rule of law and underscored his lack of common sense, as well as for sleazy acts of corruption which violated legal ethics and basic morality. [8]


4. Consenting To His Appointment Would Discredit The US Senate. If the Senate foolishly rubber-stamps Mr. Gonzales' appointment as AG, the Senators then will have proven that they're so ethically irresponsible as to be undeserving of re-election. Moreover, they will have heaped insult upon injury by sending this morally-depraved message to the world: "The United States Senate not only has condoned Mr. Gonzales' outrageously-unjust 'torture memo' misconduct, but also has chosen to reward it by elevating this monstrous shyster into the nation's top law-enforcement position!"


5. We Must Avoid Unnecessarily Exacerbating Global Tensions And Fears.  Of course, the Senate's craven capitulation to an utterly-indefensible appointment would further alienate the international community and inflame Islamic anti-Americanism.  Finally, Mr. Bush's successful appointment of Mr. Gonzales would buttress a widely-held dystopic theory about the USA, the main thesis of which is: (A) that Americans are collectively suffering from a 9/11-induced mass psychosis; (B) which caused them to re-elect their thinly-veiled neofascist dictator, "Reichsführer Bush"; and (C) whose regime has been incrementally luring them down the antidemocratic rabbit-hole, from whence the USA will emerge as the world's most dangerous rogue state -- the "American Fourth Reich." [9]


Overarching Conclusions: Don't be fooled by the fact that Mr. Gonzales neither has a wicked scar under one monocle-bedecked eye, nor foams at the mouth psychotically, nor clicks his boot-heels fascistically.  Thus far, he's slipped under the vetting radar-screen only because he embodies the banality of evil.  Nevertheless, it's all-too-clear that he's unfit to become our nation's top law-enforcement officer because: (1) he's really nothing more than Mr. Bush's bumbling personal consiglieré, which is to state that he's a toadying yes-man; and (2) his professional history is that of a pettifogging shyster who obviously lacks the requisite intellectual integrity, law-abiding temperament, and ethical judgment.  Hence, he must be rejected, as in: "Fool me once, shame on Messrs. Gonzales and Bush; fool me twice, shame on every Senator and the entire USA!"


The Bottom Line: Mr. Bush is somewhat analogous to Michael Corleone -- the potentially-honest son who allowed himself to become a bloodthirsty Mafia godfather in Mario Puzo's crime-family novels -- because he's attempting to consolidate his stranglehold upon American justice by elevating his loyal-but-sadistic scofflaw consiglieré into the AG's office, instead of appointing an honest attorney who has a history of upholding the rule of law; therefore, it is the duty of every American to insist that our US Senators vigorously oppose Alberto R. Gonzales until they've prevented this disgustingly-evil, Marquis-de-Sade-like man from eclipsing John Ashcroft as an even worse AG! [10]


ENDNOTES


[1] Read "The Universal Declaration of Human Rights" now, at:
http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html

[2] Read "Principles Of The Nüremberg Tribunal, 1950" -- and please pay special attention to Nüremberg Principle VII, which addresses complicity in war crimes -- at:
http://deoxy.org/wc/wc-nurem.htm

[3] Read Ted Rall's 11-18-04 CD essay, "Monster Of A Lawyer: Nominee For Attorney General Even Worse than Ashcroft," at:
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1118-28.htm

[4] Read Michael Ratner's 11-18-04 CD essay, "The Road To Abu Ghraib: Paved With The Legal Opinion Of Alberto R. Gonzales," at:
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1118-32.htm

[5] Read Evan Augustine Peterson III's 8-10-04 Eklektikos essay, "The American Torture Doctors," at:  http://www.geocities.com/thechristiandigest/19.html

[6] Read Grant McCool's 1-28-03 GPF article, "US Lawyers Warn Bush On War Crimes," at:
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/attack/law/2003/0128uslawyers.htm

[7] Read Colin Hallinan's 11-4-04 GPF/FPIF article, "J'accuse: War Crimes & Iraq," at:
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/attack/law/2004/1104torture.htm

[8] Watch Mark Fiore's insightful 11-17-04 animation about Alberto Gonzales, " Attorney Extraordinare," at:  http://www.markfiore.com/animation/alberto.html

[9] For one example of the innumerable essays about America's swift descent into a neofascist dystopia, see the 8-10-04 TTS essay, "FEMA and Rex 84 Program," which contends through illustrative photos that the Bushites have prepared concentration camps across the USA for their coming purge of America's antifascist dissenters, at:  http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=2344

[10] Finally, consider this retrospective admonition by Lutheran pastor Dr. Martin Niemöller, a pacifist who survived incarceration in a Nazi concentration camp from 1937 through 1945, and upon his release was responsible for drafting the "Declaration of Guilt" by the German Churches for not opposing Hitler more strenuously:


"In Germany, first they came for the Communists;
I wasn't Communist, so I didn't speak up.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists;
I wasn't a Trade Unionist, so I didn't speak up.
Then they came for the Jews;
but I was a Christian, so I didn't speak up.
Then they came for the Catholics;
but I was a Protestant, so I didn't speak up.
Then they came for me;
and there was no one left to speak up."



Author: Evan Augustine Peterson III, J.D.,
is the Executive Director of the
American Center for International Law ("ACIL").

©2004EAPIII

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

"Gonzales Added To War Crimes Complaint In Germany: CCR Says US Attorney General Designate's Testimony Before Senate Confirms His Role In Abu Ghraib Torture"


The Center for Constitutional Rights' 1-31-05 CCR article reports that USAG nominee Alberto Gonzales implicated himself through his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee as having been complicit in the torture of detainees at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere in Iraq. Thus, he could be indicted under Nüremberg Principle VII, the Geneva Conventions, and the UN Convention Against Torture ("CAT"), and prosecuted for his complicity in war crimes. Consequently, Mr. Gonzales has been added to a complaint that CCR filed with the German Federal Prosecutor in Karlsruhe, which previously named DoD Secretary Rumsfeld and other high-ranking U.S. officials as defendants.

Read the Center for Constitutional Rights' article now at this URL:
http://www.ccr-ny.org/v2/reports/report.asp?ObjID=ci38xk7IHk&Content=509


This News Bulletin's Author:
Evan Augustine Peterson III, J.D.,
Executive Director,
American Center for International Law ("ACIL").

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Other articles on this topic:

A. UIUC Professor of International Law Francis A. Boyle's CP essay, " The Dems Are Caving On Gonzales: War Criminal For Attorney General?"  November 18, 2004

Why The USA Must Reject Bush's Evil "Marquis de Sade" Nominee For Attorney General: Alberto Gonzales Wrote "Torture Memo" That Laid Groundwork For Abu Ghraib    November 25, 2004

WAR CRIMINAL FOR US ATTORNEY-GENERAL?   January 6, 2005

Action Alert: The Gonzales Appointment As Our Next Attorney General   January 7, 2005

Converting America to Fascism    January 11, 2005

A Global Gulag to Hide the War on Terror's Dirty Secrets    January 14, 2005

Shredding The Law Ushers in US Fascism   January 16, 2005

Action Alert: Call Today To Stop Gonzales For Attorney General!   January 26, 2005

Last Action Alert: The Full Senate Will Debate, And Then Vote On, Alberto   January 31, 2005

Life under the Bombs in Iraq    February 3, 2005

 

 

 
 

Did Anyone Oppose Alberto Gonzales' Confirmation As Attorney General?

by Evan Augustine Peterson III, J.D.
February 4, 2005

...At the end of the day, six turncoat Democrats did vote WITH the Republicans to confirm Mr. Gonzales (see their infamous names in Appendix B below ).  However, 35 Democrats and one Independent voted AGAINST this terrible appointment (see Appendix A below).  Perhaps the worst act of betrayal came when Democrat-in-name-only Joseph Lieberman (CT) chose to quote a Biblical passage about doing justice, but then perversely ignored Mr. Gonzales' recent complicity in grave injustices, while advocating his confirmation.  

   
 

Home     Disclaimer/Fair Use