ON CAPITAL HILL
Once an Ally of Bush at
Home,
Kennedy Lashes Out on Iraq
By CARL HULSE,
WASHINGTON,
Sept. 26 — After working hand-in-hand with President Bush on education
and health programs, Senator Edward M. Kennedy is digging in for a fight
over Iraq, calling it the "defining issue" of this congressional session.
Mr. Kennedy, to many the
personification of the liberal Democrat, has rendered a harsh judgment against
the Bush administration with caustic statements that began last week and continued
today. At every turn, and with rising passion, he has blistered the White House
for its calculation to go to war and for failing to adequately plan for the
occupation.
Today, at an event sponsored
by the Congressional Black Caucus, Mr. Kennedy ridiculed a 28-page planning
document on Iraq produced by the administration, calling it an insult and tossing
it into the air.
Later, on the Senate floor,
he said, "The tragedy is that our troops are paying with their lives because
the administration failed to prepare a plan to win the peace."
Those comments were only
slightly toned down from remarks Mr. Kennedy made last week when he called the
rationale for the war a "fraud" and said taxpayer money was being used to bribe
foreign leaders to send troops to Iraq.
Taken together, the senator's
remarks have cooled what had been a surprisingly good working relationship with
Mr. Bush.
President Bush and Senator
Kennedy produced an education program in the president's first year, and in
recent months they had worked together to advance a prescription drug plan.
Only a few weeks ago, Mr. Kennedy attended a private bill-signing at the White
House and the two members of America's leading political families had a cordial
meeting, aides said.
But Mr. Bush has characterized
Mr. Kennedy's remarks on Iraq as "uncivil."
Senator Robert F. Bennett,
Republican of Utah, said of Mr. Kennedy, "He is flat wrong.
"To accuse the president
of what is essentially an impeachable offense, to use those words, demonstrates
a willingness to recklessness that is very disturbing," he said.
But today Mr. Kennedy received
unequivocal support when he lashed out at the administration during his appearance
at the Congressional Black Caucus. Those attending embraced Mr. Kennedy and
applauded his stand. "You have nothing to apologize for because you are telling
the truth," said the Rev. Al Sharpton, who is seeking the Democratic presidential
nomination.
Republicans say the criticism
of the administration shows Mr. Kennedy at his worst, grabbing the spotlight
to promote outdated liberal ideals.
"The debate comes down to
one question," said Stuart Roy, a spokesman for House Majority Leader Tom DeLay.
"Are we a nation at war with terror or are we longing for a return to the weak
and indecisive foreign policy of the past?"
Some Democrats say privately
that Mr. Kennedy probably went too far when he talked of bribes and fraud. But
his allies say these are not spur-of-the-moment statements. His aides say he
has been consulting a variety of experts, including former Secretary of State
Madeleine K. Albright and the United Nations secretary general, Kofi Annan.
Mr. Kennedy, who with Senator
Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia unsuccessfully led Democratic opposition to
the resolution authorizing the invasion of Iraq, said that he has been consistent
in his position and that more Americans are coming to his view.
"There is an increasing
kind of awareness and understanding among the American people that we need a
plan that brings in other countries and the U.N., and provides full disclosure
with regards to contracts," Mr. Kennedy said. "And we need to pay for it without
harming the priorities at home."
His colleagues say Mr. Kennedy,
with more than 40 years in the Senate and national image, can easily shrug off
criticism that could deter others.
"It is somebody who is leading
the way, standing up in a difficult situation, speaking bluntly and forcefully,"
said Senator Jack Reed, Democrat of Rhode Island. "It sort of reaffirms the
positions we took last fall.
"Also, he tends to
get a little more attention than we do."
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/27/politics/27KENN.html?ex=1065585600&en=b1b400ac767a5e1b&ei=5070
|