Home


Of Militarism, Fascism, War And National Consciousness:
Any Authentic Pilgrimage Toward A Nonviolent Society
Requires A Clearer Understanding Of The Beast Within


by Evan Augustine Peterson III, J.D., February 6, 2005


"The sinews of war are endless profits." :
- Cicero, Orationes Philippicæ, v, c (c. 60 B.C.)

 

"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called children of God." :
- Jesus the Christ, "The Beatitudes," Matthew 5:9 (NRSV)

 

Every nation that authentically seeks to become a peacemaking society must make an introspective pit-stop, somewhere along its pilgrimage to nonviolence, to wrestle self-critically with this thorny question: "What is this strange killer instinct doing inside of human nature -- both mine and yours?"  As the above quotations would indicate, two mutually-exclusive paths exist -- the national path to war's filthy lucre or the national path to God's just peace -- and yet there are no easy answers to this difficult question.

However, as if to provide an answer, a group of social scientists from the Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict Research Group devoted their entire conference in June of 2004 -- entitled "Why Neighbors Kill: Explaining The Breakdown Of Ethnic Relations" -- to understanding human nature's genocidal warmaking instinct [1].  To deepen their inquiry into the bellicose side of human nature, these scholars posed the following 3 questions.

1. Anthropological -- "Individual animals fight but do not collectively engage in war; what, then, causes human beings to wage war against each another?"
2. Psychological -- "What causes people to polarize into: (a) 'Us' -- one's
sense of psychological identification with a group, based on kinship, contract, ethnicity, religion, tribe, or nationality, which forms 'The Self' ; versus (b) 'Them' -- those who fall outside the boundaries of one's group, the unpeople we designated as 'The Other'?"
3. Sociological -- "Social scientists know that manifestations of trouble or
propagandistic brainwashing will create a shared sense of threat, which in turn causes people both to retreat into the security of the group and to polarize their identities into 'Us' and "Them' -- but what actually causes people go to war?"

In answering their third question, these scholars concluded that a hierarchical network of social planning is required to mobilize people for war.  It must include:
A. A top level, to create the vision (e.g., the Plan for the New American Century's ("PNAC") neoconservatives had already planned the invasion of Iraq by 1997-8) [2].
B. A middle level, to administer the top tier's plan, to give the orders, to arouse peoples' fighting instinct by waving the bloody shirt and reciting a history of injustice (e.g., "After 9/11, everything must be different!"), and to transfer aggression (e.g., "We must attack Iraq, or our cities will be destroyed by Saddam's deadly WMD arsenal -- in the form of a mushroom cloud!").
C. And a bottom level, to be manipulated into doing the fighting, the killing
[3], and the dying through propagandistic fearmongering, demonization of the foe until he is reduced to a subhuman beast [4], peer-pressure (e.g., "It's your patriotic duty to kill those freaking 'hajis'!) [5], and narcotizing drugs [6]. 

Therefore, when viewed from the illuminating standpoint of the social sciences, it appears inevitable that there is a first step in the multicausative genesis of MILITARISM -- which is an essential component of any nation's decline into FASCISM [7] -- and that is deliberate top-down social organization to produce the infrastructural capacity with which to conquer other peoples and nations through force of arms. 

To achieve the societal transition to militarism, the upper classes must indoctrinate themselves with a morally-blind imperialist war-profiteering mentality  before they will organize the lower classes into a hierarchical society that can harvest the poisonous fruits of war.  Hence, militarism's belligerently self-righteous jingoistic mindset tends to originate with the economic interests of upper class, and then to disseminate downward.

Furthermore, so as not to unduly place blame for the phenomenon of militaristic fascism onto any one socioeconomic class, it should be reiterated that human nature itself contains the seeds that have repeately sprouted, throughout history, into the lethal tree of war.  Or, as the renowned ethologist Konrad Lorenz once trenchantly observed, "The need today is for a gentler humankind, for the hand that wielded the axe against the ice and the saber-toothed tiger now cradles the machine gun equally as lovingly." 

Additionally, as Cicero wryly observed some 2,064 years ago, war can be extraordinarily profitable for those who invest in, or are members of, the military-industrial complex.  And, as political economist Joseph Schumpeter correctly pointed out in his magnum opus, Capitalism, Socialism And Democracy (Perennial, 1962), global capitalism inherently contains within itself the very real danger that even a democratic nation could become economically addicted to war -- and hence to militarism -- for several reasons, but primarily to lessen the recessionary impact of "creative destruction" during its volatile business cycles. 

Indeed, the twenty-first century began with a global recession that was a major factor in proximately causing at least one illegal war of aggression, from which one might infer that multinational corporate capitalism's postmodern version of "creative destruction" is going to be significantly more destructive than creative! 

This is NOT to contend that capitalism is itself the sole cause of wars!  Rather, it is to state that global capitalism, when objectively viewed in its sociopolitical context, can truthfully be said to exacerbate the bellicose propensities in human nature by cyclically supplying nations -- especially the industrialized nations -- with an economic motive to engage in militaristic warmongering. 

The Bottom Line: America's national consciousness is undergoing an incremental regression toward fascism because hubristic nations are always locked into a blinkered mindset of self-righteous denial, which cannot recognize its own darker nature, and which seeks to exalt itself among the nations as if it was "the shining city upon a hill," but which instead sets itself up to experience a long hard fall into militaristic fascism; and that's why any nation's pilgrimage beyond militarism to a mature state of nonviolent peacemaking requires that its citizens must genuinely recognize the darker impulses within human nature, and then become self-critical enough to stop feeding the feral beast that lurks within us all -- individually and collectively [8-10].

 


ENDNOTES

1. Olivia Ward's 6-5-04 CD essay, "Battling to Understand Our Genocidal Instinct," at: 
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0605-01.htm
2. PNAC's neocon agenda for "Iraq/Middle East [1997-2000]," at:
http://newamericancentury.org/iraqmiddleeast2000-1997.htm

3. Esther Schrader's 2-4-05 CD/LAT article, "General Draws Fire For Saying 'It's Fun To Shoot' The Enemy," reports that USMC Lt. General James Mattis, while speaking before 200 people at the San Diego Convention Center on 2-1-05, publicly stated that: "Actually, it's fun to fight.  It's a hell of a hoot.  It's fun to shoot some people."  And then again, referring to the US invasion of Afghanistan, he said: "So it's a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them!"  A local TV reporter said the audience -- a military contractors' convention -- erupted into loud laughter and applause upon hearing these comments: 
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0204-22.htm

4. Luc Santes' 5-11-04 NYT essay, "Tourists And Torturers," at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/11/opinion/11SANT.html?ex=1107752400&en=2b12aaf8d4113c24&ei=
5070&oref=login&th
5. Bob Herbert's CD/NYT essay, "'Gooks' To 'Hajis'," at:
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0521-08.htm
6. A. Beyond narcotizing drugs, the US military is using stimulant drugs in Iraq, as reported in Tom Spears' 10-11-03 TOW article, "New Drug May Help Soldiers Stay Awake: Doctors Unsure Of Long-Term Effects," at: 
http://www.modafinil.com/article/soldiers.html  
    B. Moreover, the Pentagon has been researching the use of drugs as biochemical weapons, as reported in The Sunshine Project's 2-11-03 SP article, " Pentagon Perverts Pharma: Liability & Public Image In The Pentagon's Drug Weapons Research," at:
http://www.sunshineproject.org/publications/pr/pr110203.html
7. A. Ritt Goldstein's 7-8-04 CD/AT article, "US: Patriotic Pride And Fear," reports that writings by Canadian psychologist Daniel Burston and American political scientist Michael Parenti have come to the same disturbing conclusion -- albeit from the different perspectives of their own disciplines -- that the Bushite USA seems to be undergoing the process of a societal regression into fascism:  http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0709-09.htm
   B. Lew Rockwell's 12-31-04 LR essay, "The Reality Of Red-State Fascism," explains why he thinks fascism has appeared among the USA's red-state bourgeoisie:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/rockwell/red-state-fascism.html

   C. In TU History Professor Gary Leupp's excellent 1-13-05 CP essay, " Everybody's Talkin' About Christian Fascism: Fightin' For The Lord," he breaks down the overbroad charge about "Christian Fascism" into two groups -- Christian fundamentalists and Jewish neocons -- and then concludes that generalized "American Fascism" doesn't exist yet.  However, Professor Leupp never defines "fascism," so it remains unclear whether his conclusion is correct: 
http://counterpunch.org/leupp01132005.html
8. Joan Chittister's 1-28-05 CD/NCR essay, "What The Rest Of The World Watched On Inauguration Day," analyzes the mindset that blithely ignores the personal and global consequences of the US military's recent unjust shooting of an unarmed family of seven civilian noncombatants at a checkpoint in Tal Afar, Iraq:
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0128-35.htm

9. Agence France Presse's 2-2-05 CD/AFP article, "Rumsfeld Asks for Restoration of Nuclear 'Bunker Buster' Program," reports that DoD Secretary Rumsfeld is currently seeking to restore $27 million in Congressional funding for the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator ("RNEP") program, colloquially known as the "bunker buster mini-nuke": 
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0202-10.htm

10. Evan Augustine Peterson III's 9-29-04 ICH essay, "Does Mr. Bush's Foreign Policy Mirror The American Peoples' Soul?," correlates Mr. Bush's militarization of US foreign policy with the increasing bellicosity of this nation's collective consciousness:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6977.htm

Author: Evan Augustine Peterson III, J.D.,
is the Executive Director of the
American Center for International Law ("ACIL").

©2005EAPIII

 

Home     Disclaimer/Fair Use